๐Ÿ‡จ Head and Neck

์‚ผ์„ฑ์˜ dose schedule

De-escalation

  • RTOG 0129
  • ECOG 3311
  • DART trial
  • RTOG 0022

Hypofractionation

UKHAN1 (Tobias, Lanc Onc, 2010 / Sanghera, IJROBP, 2007)

55/20 to primary, 45/20 for ENI

Oncologic outcome

  • 2y LC ~75%, drops to 64% for T3-4

Toxicity

Mucosal toxicity peaks at 5w

IAEA-HYPNO (Bentzen, LBA02 ASTRO 2023, phase III)

Introduction

  • 66/33 (DAHANCA) vs 44-55/20
  • 792 pts with OP(51%) HPX (14%) LX (25%) OC (9%)

Oncologic outcome

  • 3y OS ~55%, 3y PFS 45%, 3y LRC 51%

Toxicity

3y late G3+ AE ~20% โ†’ 19%

CompARE (NCT04116047, phase III)

70/35/CDDP vs 64/25/CDDP vs Surgery

695 pts with IR and HR OPC

240403 250307 pf. ์šฐํ™๊ท 

Definition

  • >2.0Gy/Fx โ† according to FARO survey of hypofractionation in HNSCC in 2023
  • โ‰ฅ3.0Gy/Fx โ† for pf. Wu
2025 INNOCENCE-ASIA survey

https://res.craft.do/user/full/f611c081-69c7-3866-2629-0612f25b2a71/doc/C90A1C03-D6C0-4C9C-881F-497A82528D62/B479CC80-894F-43D1-BAA0-7BC0C85170B8_2/73C3KF4S1NV9IjXRf4V4UHwTh1A8lnEXczA46F3cHa4z/Image.png

5R = 4R + inherent radiosensitivity

Parameters for radiotherapy

  1. Total dose
  2. Dose per fraction
  3. Overall treatment time
    Deceleration: repopulation์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋  ๊ฒƒ.
    Acceleration: โ€ป small cell lung cancer ๋Š” bid๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฒŒ ์ข‹๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•œ๋‹ค.
    • Reimbursement ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ฒŒ ๋จ.
    • CCRT์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ž…์ฆ๋˜๋ฉด์„œ altered fractionation ์•ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋จ.
  4. Time interval between fractions
    โ†’ 4์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ด๋‚ด๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋ฉด toxicity ์ปค์ง„๋‹ค. ์ตœ์†Œ 6์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ด์ƒ์€ ๋„์šฐ๋„๋ก.
  5. Target volume
    • 5+5mm rule์„ ๊ผญ ์ง€์ผœ์•ผ ํ• ๊นŒ โ†’ ์ดํ˜œ์ธ ์„ ์ƒ๋‹˜ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด +5mm๋งŒ ํ•ด๋„ ๊ดœ์ฐฎ๋”๋ผ.
    • Vocal cord
      • 2D bilateral field – C5 ๊ทผ์ฒ˜ 5x5cm2 field.
        maximal dose๋Š” ๊ฐ€์šด๋ฐ๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ๋ฐ”๊นฅ์ชฝ skin์— ๋งŽ์ด ๋“ค์–ด๊ฐ€๊ฒŒ ๋˜์–ด hot spot์ด carotid์— ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.
      • Single vocal cord irradiation (Al-Mamgani A et al., IJROBP, 2015)
https://res.craft.do/user/full/f611c081-69c7-3866-2629-0612f25b2a71/doc/C90A1C03-D6C0-4C9C-881F-497A82528D62/C53BE4DB-5147-425E-A17E-C42E45B9CCA5_2/gKuCxWyulfpSjHclA9QwOwq7xnHJj6WcG8QC7MUxbMcz/Image.png

GOAT experiment

48Gy in 4Gy dd โ†’ erythema 34%, fibrosis 67%
52Gy in 2.4Gy dd โ†’ erythema 30%, fibrosis 5%

Various schemes

Conventional (SNUH)

  • in all SIB tech. total 30fx for definitive, 28fx for postop adj., once daily, 5f/week

Review by Piras A et al.

https://res.craft.do/user/full/f611c081-69c7-3866-2629-0612f25b2a71/doc/C90A1C03-D6C0-4C9C-881F-497A82528D62/60F61316-2B37-459F-B09A-B25A10D02165_2/9OcO6veeehokAInKYzrEgPTwHzadjAldZCPm53dQcysz/Image.png

HNSCC palliation ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ณดํ†ต 3Gy x10, 4Gy x5, 8Gy x1์„ ๋งŽ์ด ํ•œ๋‹ค.

Vocal cord

https://res.craft.do/user/full/f611c081-69c7-3866-2629-0612f25b2a71/doc/C90A1C03-D6C0-4C9C-881F-497A82528D62/469034A7-94A4-4060-83C7-D8A0BDF03D90_2/28sb8N6GlnHf1SV7IKmr5sJLxQptKS3EcydnUHsBYPYz/Image.png

2Gy vs 2.25Gy

โญ๏ธNCD analysis) Yamazaki et al., IJROBP, 2006

<2.5Gy vs 2.5Gy

Lim Y et al., Cancer Res Treat, 2015 (SNUH)

<2.5Gy vs 2.5Gy
2.5Gy๊ฐ€ survival์ด ๋” ์ข‹๋”๋ผ.

โ›” SNUH phase I trial (pf. Wu, ์œ ๋„์†” ์„ ์ƒ๋‹˜)

Dose limiting toxicity in 5Gy per fx arm
59.5Gy/3.5Gy (17fx) can be safely delievered

5Gy per fx arm โ†’ 2 G3 chronic laryngegal inflammation

  • Prev. prospective trial
    • CTV1 = GTV+3mm margin
    • CTV2 = remaining larynx (thyrodid notch – cricoid cartilage)
  • Changes from 2018
    • Posterior commissure was excluded from CTV
      -> posterior commissure was treated in 9 (25.7%) patients)
  • PTV = CTV+3mm
    • CTV to PTV expansion to the posterior direction was reduced when CTV was close to hypopharynx
  • 59.5Gy/17Fx to PTV1, 47.6Gy/17Fx to PTV2
  • 35 pts recruited -> 7 from prev. prospective trial in 2015
  • MFU 16.23 mo
  • No LRR, DM, death reported
  • 1 Gr.3 acute mucositis

supraglottic ca.๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ENI๋ฅผ ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋‚˜, ๊ณ ๋ น์— ์ผ๋ถ€ ํ™˜์ž์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ hypofractionation ์ง„ํ–‰ ์ค‘.

Treatment outcomes

  • Hypofx with 3.5Gy/f is effective

Considerations

  • 2.25Gy seems safe. In early cancer, 2.5Gy or even higher dd is feasible.

์ž‘๋…„ ASTRO ๋ฐœํ‘œ – Perillo A et al. Radiation Oncol, 2021

SABR at IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Center Institute, Italy

https://res.craft.do/user/full/f611c081-69c7-3866-2629-0612f25b2a71/doc/C90A1C03-D6C0-4C9C-881F-497A82528D62/31CFA030-CCFB-4A74-9FA0-3D67B22D93DE_2/AJvUcH5Q8bH6ipb3Kjx5CSatVyayW8WYJXDfxaF2AO8z/Image.png

ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์นจ
PTV margin์„ ๊ณ„์† ์ค„์—ฌ ๋‚˜๊ฐ€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ. ์ง€๊ธˆ๋„ palliation ์—์„œ๋Š” CTV=PTV ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉ.
Bulkyํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” (ํŠนํžˆ ACC) GTV-1.0cm์— 2.5-3Gy ๋ฅผ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋„ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•ด ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ.

UKHAN1 (Tobias, Lanc Onc, 2010 / Sanghera, IJROBP, 2007)

55/20 to primary, 45/20 for ENI

Oncologic outcome

  • 2y LC ~75%, drops to 64% for T3-4

Toxicity

Mucosal toxicity peaks at 5w

IAEA-HYPNO (Bentzen, LBA02 ASTRO 2023, phase III)

Introduction

  • 66/33 (DAHANCA) vs 44-55/20
  • 792 pts with OP(51%) HPX (14%) LX (25%) OC (9%)

Oncologic outcome

  • 3y OS ~55%, 3y PFS 45%, 3y LRC 51%

Toxicity

3y late G3+ AE ~20% โ†’ 19%

CompARE (NCT04116047, phase III)

70/35/CDDP vs 64/25/CDDP vs Surgery

695 pts with IR and HR OPC

SABR

Study at italy

36 Gy/3 Fx